Deck : Rules of the Road - 598/1025
|
|---|
| « Previous Question |
| BOTH INTERNATIONAL & INLAND You are underway in thick fog. You have not determined if risk of collision exists. Which statement is TRUE? |
| A) Your speed must be reduced to bare steerageway. |
| B) The radar should always be kept on a short-range scale. |
| C) A look-out is not required if the radar is on. |
| D) Fog signals are only required when a vessel is detected by radar. |
loading answer...
| Comments |
|---|
| diannewilso - 2024-05-08 02:19:53 Registered (339) |
| No Gam Stop: Explore gaming options outside the Gam Stop network for a thrilling and unrestricted gambling experience. Discover non-Gam Stop options for endless entertainment. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/best-casinos-not-gamstop-ranked-150500420.html |
| Corno - 2024-04-30 18:59:00 Member (8) |
| But no other sounds signals have been heard ugh |
| fixinbones - 2020-08-19 11:37:45 Member (7) |
| Yes poorly worded but all the other choices are clearly wrong |
| laremias - 2019-04-24 12:41:41 Member (8) |
| THICC fog |
| chicks122994 - 2015-11-03 20:59:00 Member (1) |
| I agree. Additionally, the question says that I "have not determined if risk of collision exists." It does not say I am in doubt as to whether risk of collision exists (which would, therefore, deem such risk to exist by my doubt alone IAW Rule 7). |
| usnmustanger - 2015-07-21 15:23:49 Registered (1) |
| I agree with Polkadot2012--this is a very poorly worded question. There is certainly some missing information. |
| polkadot2012 - 2015-02-18 19:07:51 Member (11) |
| This question is worded poorly. IAW Rule 19 (e), "Except where it has been determine that a risk of collision does not exist, every vessel WHICH HEARS APPARENTLY FORWARD OF HER BEAM THE FOG SIGNAL OF ANOTHER VESSEL... shall reduce her speed to the minimum at which she can be kept on course.". There was no mention of hearing a fog signal forward of the beam. Therefore we cannot assume there is one there. |